possible rename role for how it shows up in ansible galaxy

[itewk]

Continuation of conversation from https://github.com/oasis-roles/ansible-role-redhat_satellite6_storage/issues/2#issuecomment-599626055

Suggested new names:

• redhat_satellite6_storage
• satellite6_storage
• redhat_sat6_storage
• sat6_storage

[itewk]

@greg-hellings thoughts? do you all have naming standards? Full product name vs short? include redhat when its a red hat product vs targeted at an upstream that may have the same name?

[stdevel]

My favorite is satellite6_storage - it's short and self-explanatory. :) Another one would be katello_storage - as Foreman/Katello could also be used in a vanilla way.

[greg-hellings]

Any standards we have are in the meta_standards role. Going from memory, our only standards are to have _ instead of - characters. Basically, a role name needs to be a valid Python identifier.

Personally, I would name this role satellite_storage and try to have support for any supported versions of Satellite from this one role. Rather than fix the satellite version into the name, which I don't think gains us much unless we're absolutely certain that we'll never be able to support multiple versions in one role. Once we move it into a collection I would just name it storage and name the whole collection oasis_roles.satellite at that time.

[stdevel]

That's a good idea as Red Hat Satellite 7 is already in rough planning. So satellite_storage now looks also best to me.

[itewk]

@stdevel make it so :)

[stdevel]

PR was created - see also #7

[stdevel]

PR was merged, so the issue can be closed! 🎉