Closed tschmidtb51 closed 3 years ago
That probably will require TC discussion. Can you send it via email to the TC?
Is this more a constrained vocabulary or do we offer an extension point (to add option values)?
I'll write up an suggestion and provide that as a DRAFT PR and link to that via email.
I added the Draft PR #290. Please comment directly there.
While writing the requirements for the CSAF provider I realized that our current suggestion makes it harder for automation than it should be as we offer multiple options which can be served as a CSAF provider. As a user you don't know in advance which option will be used. Therefore, I suggest to link all to a
provider-metadata.json
(instead of either a directory or a ROLIE service document) which will explicitly state also the metadata used later on for the CSAF aggregator.This would allow to skip the ROLIE Service Document.
Thoughts?
Flag @sthagen, @santosomar, @mprpic, @tolim, @zmanion for attention...