Open johnwunder opened 6 years ago
Need to review this change with the community again.
Text from Jason, to add to section 5:
Data marking support in this standard is present in order to facilitate data interchange within and amongst trust group communities. While the standard defines the methodology to communicate data markings, and also includes standard definitions for select marking types, it does not attempt to define how individual software implementations must or must not behave with respect to any individual marking. Understanding that the behavior of any individual software implementation with regard to data markings is highly context-specific and thus out of scope of this standard, the support of any specific marking type is considered OPTIONAL.
Since this didn't make it into STIX 2.1, it would be great to see this proposed as an extension and submitted to the Common Objects Repository following the example of ACS markings. We need a champion for this activity.
We've discussed adding Information Exchange Protocol (from FIRST) as a mechanism to mark data in STIX.