Closed dlemire60 closed 3 years ago
Just to be extra clear, I would recommend noting that one must be either testing or operations, but not both. Otherwise, I think it looks pretty good.
Just to be extra clear, I would recommend noting that one must be either testing or operations, but not both.
Is that an essential requirement? For example, it seems that testing vs. operations could just be a "mode" configuration setting for a single implementation: TLS off for testing, TLS on for operations. Frankly, that was more how I'd envisioned it working.
Otherwise, I think it looks pretty good.
Thanks
This PR was discussed at the 8/11/2021 working meeting and approved for merging at the 8/25/2021 working meeting.
This PR defines testing (non-secure) and operations (secure) conformance targets and allocates conformance requirements accordingly. It also incorporate a number of minor updates throughout associated with splitting the conformance targets and following through with adjustments from PR #114 and PR #115.