Closed dlemire60 closed 2 years ago
Per discussion at the 27 July 2022 working meeting:
@Vasileios-Mavroeidis wrote:
"maybe I would say "...regarding the command""
That would be a new PR at this point, since we've merged this one, but it's certainly a reasonable suggestion.
However. I can just add this to a branch I've got with minor editorial changes and capture it that way.
This PR responds to LS issue #369 and adds the
description
argument proposed in the PF AP (Section 2.1.3.2) to the LS instead.If this PR is approved, Section 2.1.3.2 of the PF AP should be edited to remove this as an AP-unique argument.