Open philr-vistatec opened 3 years ago
+1
I am not sure why the long property names are a problem? Is it a hard limit problem? or just don't feel comfortable around long property names? I don't think u handcode them.. is human readability of JLIFF files the issue u aim to address? I am worried that the short property names would be different compared to XLIFF attribute names and thus cause (another) roundtripping complexity..
It is primarily aesthetic and secondarily byte size in a heavily annotated document.
To review in November 23 meeting and decide on path ahead..
I agree with @DavidFatDavidF opinion, sharing a concern that shortening the property names will no longer correspond to XLIFF attributes, which may likely increase roundtrip complexity. Changing the property names will require a complete JSON Schema overhaul and extensive JLIFF Spec amendment effort.
I hate to add this given where we are in the process but best before we publish. Could we revisit property names like
its_locQualityIssuesArray
and consider abbreviating toits_lqiArray
andits_locQualityIssueComment
toits_lqiComment
?