Open aaronpk opened 9 months ago
In my own defense - RFC 7523 was published several years before RFC8725...
Anyway, such a recommendation (and maybe even definition of one) seems reasonable as long as it doesn't suggest or imply that plain vanilla RFC 7523 implementations/deployments (new or existing) can't function as-is or are problematic security-wise or otherwise somehow deficient.
There should probably be a recommendation for a media type for the JWT Authorization Grant, because:
grant_type=urn:ietf:params:oauth:grant-type:jwt-bearer
needs to know how to process the JWT authorization differently from other uses of JWT-BearerRFC 7523 was published before the more recent recommendation of explicit typing
I don't think this draft needs to define one, but it should at least recommend that an implementation uses one.