Support for multiple VCs in one VP

[awoie]

We should describe how multiple VCs and VPs can be combined in one VP.

[awoie]

Would the following make sense?

{
  "@context": [
    "https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials/v1"
  ],
  "type": “Verifiable”Presentation,
  "verifiableCredential": [ 
     “b64-(sd-jwt-combined-format-4-persenation)-#1”,
     “b64-(sd-jwt-combined-format-4-persenation)-#2” 
  ]
}

[awoie]

After thinking about this a bit more, I'd say that this doesn't have to be solved in the VC-SD-JWT spec. It should be solved at the protocol level, e.g., OpenID4VP where the vp_token would contain an array of VP-SD-JWTs.

[tlodderstedt]

+1

No need for another envelope. On 19. May 2023 at 11:26 +0200, Oliver Terbu @.***>, wrote:

After thinking about this a bit more, I'd say that this doesn't have to be solved in the VC-SD-JWT spec. It should be solved at the protocol level, e.g., OpenID4VP where the vp_token would contain an array of VP-SD-JWTs. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>

[danielfett]

As discussed in our call, this should not be handled by our specification.

[awoie]

As discussed on the editor's call (5/23), closing this issue since no longer needed.