Closed Sakurann closed 1 year ago
The w3c-vc
example currently uses a different key. We should call that out or change the example to the default key. I think that having one example with a different key (type) doesn't hurt, so we should call out that this example uses a different key.
The
w3c-vc
example currently uses a different key. We should call that out or change the example to the default key. I think that having one example with a different key (type) doesn't hurt, so we should call out that this example uses a different key.
Either way, the holder's public key is already available in the payload of the example SD-JWTs. So it doesn't need to be and shouldn't be included here.
w3c-vc uses a different KB JWT key but the same issuer key, correct?
w3c-vc uses a different KB JWT key but the same issuer key, correct?
Yeah, i believe so. But no signed content is actually shown in that example. That example just shows the payload and disclosure content.
addresses Issue #241.