Closed jogu closed 3 months ago
This is how Presentation
is defined in OID4VP:
Presentation: Data that is presented to a specific Verifier, derived from one or more Verifiable Credentials that can be from the same or different Credential Issuers.
https://openid.github.io/OpenID4VP/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-wg-draft.html#section-2-3.8
and I think it's better define it than just make it lower-case, as the term is used pretty frequently.
I don't think just removing the capitalization helps. It's still an undefined term. In the spirit of #374, it seems like we actually want two concepts here, (1) handing someone an Issuer JWT + disclosures, where they can verify its integrity, drop disclosures and/or hand it to someone else, and (2) handing someone an Issuer JWT + disclosures + KB JWT, where the only thing they can do is verify it.
I think https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/issues/384 goes a long way towards addressing this.
I meant #394, sorry.
(I think you meant 394, @bc-pi..?)
I believe the merging of https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/pull/394 clears this one up
There are various sentences like:
where presentation has a capital P as if it's a defined term. Probably it should have an actual definition (I can't find one) but if not it should probably be lower cased?