Closed bc-pi closed 5 months ago
I think the following change might be cleaner per "Check that the Key Binding JWT is valid in all other respects" should call a particular algorithm from the other specs that it cites.
in Jefferey's review.
"9. Check that the Key Binding JWT is valid in all other respects, per [@!RFC7519] and [@!RFC8725]." -> "9. Check that the Key Binding JWT is a valid JWT in all other respects, per [@!RFC7519] and [@!RFC8725]."
I think the following change might be cleaner per
"Check that the Key Binding JWT is valid in all other respects" should call a particular algorithm from the other specs that it cites.
in Jefferey's review."9. Check that the Key Binding JWT is valid in all other respects, per [@!RFC7519] and [@!RFC8725]." -> "9. Check that the Key Binding JWT is a valid JWT in all other respects, per [@!RFC7519] and [@!RFC8725]."
Sure, that's done in 4442c3a06767498ee24154024d8dff987325b08f
which can be found at #389