Closed srosenda closed 5 months ago
The distinguishing of SD-JWT from SD-JWT+KB is a good clarifying change in -09. Some extra mentions of KB-JWT still remain that could probably removed:
In 5. SD-JWT and SD-JWT+KB Data Formats:
An SD-JWT without Disclosures and without a KB-JWT
and
An SD-JWT with Disclosures and without a KB-JWT
The "and without a KB-JWT" could be removed as there are separate examples for SD-JWT+KB and SD-JWT is now defined not to include KB-JWT.
Thanks @srosenda, PR #441 does exactly what you've suggested.
👍 approved the PR (#441) too.
The distinguishing of SD-JWT from SD-JWT+KB is a good clarifying change in -09. Some extra mentions of KB-JWT still remain that could probably removed:
In 5. SD-JWT and SD-JWT+KB Data Formats:
and
The "and without a KB-JWT" could be removed as there are separate examples for SD-JWT+KB and SD-JWT is now defined not to include KB-JWT.