oauth-wg oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt issues

oauth-wg / oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/

Other

57 stars 31 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

SD-JWT Parser requires saving the base64 encoded values?

#532 samuelgoto opened 1 week ago
0
Small (and optional) editorial SD-JWT+KB's spec suggestion: remove whitespace from examples of JSON serialization

#531 samuelgoto opened 1 week ago
0
Missing procedures for Holder to validate disclosures received from Issuer

#530 rohanmahy opened 1 week ago
1
Update of Issue #514 (new section 9.12) for the support of Post Quantum cryptography

#529 Denisthemalice opened 2 weeks ago
0
Comments and issues raised during the 1rst and the 2nd WGLC have not been addressed in -14

#528 Denisthemalice opened 2 weeks ago
0
Note that the Hash Function Claim value is case-sensitive

#525 bc-pi closed 2 weeks ago
1
Update typ in SD-JWT VC example

#524 bc-pi closed 2 weeks ago
0
Hash Function Claim value case-sensitivity

#523 spheroid closed 2 weeks ago
6
The last paragraph of section 10.5 (Issuer Identifier) can be removed

#522 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
A new section about "Issuer anonymity" should be added

#521 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
Section 10.3 (Confidentiality during Transport) should also mention integrity

#520 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
Since claims always contain privacy-sensitive data section 10.2 would need to be reworded

#519 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
Holders SHOULD NOT be required to store SD-JWTs "only in encrypted form"

#518 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
Section 10.2 should be made more general to consider both the storage of signed and un-signed data

#517 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
A new section about "End-User intrackability" should be added

#516 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
1
The term "unlinkability" is overloaded. For more clarity, the wording "End-user intrackability" should be used in addition

#515 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
A section should be added to consider the case of a presentation of claims to Verifier that have been issued by different Issuers

#514 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
Section 9.5 (Key Binding) needs to be revised to consider the case of a collusion between End-Users

#513 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
Section 7.3 needs to be revised to describe which data structures can be transmitted

#512 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
The requirement for an Issuer of not providing a SD-JWT+KB-JWT should be removed

#511 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
Verification steps for the KB-JWT are missing in section 7.1

#510 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
Validation steps for the KB-JWT are missing

#509 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
The iat time at which the Key Binding JWT was issued should not be REQUIRED

#508 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
It is important to mention the use of decoy digests and of the shuffling of the digests included in the SD-JWT payload

#507 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
How the Holder key pair is established cannot be placed "out of the scope of this document"

#506 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
Add an example of using arrays for "age_over" and "age_under" claims

#505 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
It would be worth to mention that the Issuer decides which claims are always disclosed

#504 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
The description of the SD-JWT+KB is confusing

#503 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
1
The description of the SD-JWT can be improved

#502 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
The benefits of the nonce and of the audience value can be made more accurate

#501 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
The data elements sent to the Verifier are not correctly defined

#500 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
The format used to carry both the SD-JWT and the Disclosures is unclear

#499 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
Figure 1 should be corrected to take into account the existence of an End-user and to consider KB-JWT instead of KB

#498 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
The term End-User should be added to the definitions

#497 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
The definition of a Verifier would need to be reworded

#496 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
The definition of an Holder would need to be reworded

#495 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
The definition of an Issuer would need to be reworded

#494 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
The definition of a "key binding JWT" would need to be reworded

#493 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
The definition of "key binding" would need to be reworded

#492 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
The definition of the Selectively Disclosable JWT (SD-JWT) would need to be reworded

#491 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
The definition of the SD-JWT+KB structure needs to be reworded

#490 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
A (KB-JWT) does not demonstrate a "proof of possession" of private key

#489 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
2
What is a "facility for associating an SD-JWT with a key pair" ?

#488 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
Difference between "a format extending the JWS Compact Serialization" and "an alternate format extending the JWS JSON Serialization" ?

#487 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
The structure called "SD-JWT+KB" should be renamed "SD-JWT+KB-JWT"

#486 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
Key binding will be ineffective unless the SD-JWT includes an additional claim that indicates the Holder characteristics: "hcahr"

#485 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
A Holder does not present a "JWT" to a Verifier but "SD-JWT + Sel.Claims"

#484 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
Indicate that "claims" refers either to object properties (name/value pairs) and to array elements

#483 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
Make a difference between the Holder which is an *application* and the individual (i.e. End-User)

#482 Denisthemalice closed 2 weeks ago
0
Address Denis' comments

#481 danielfett closed 2 weeks ago
1