Closed ioggstream closed 3 years ago
@aaronpk I tried to reorganize the TLS parts in a single section. As a first-time reader, I found the continuous reminders to TLS confusing and inherently suggesting that TLS was only required for some flows.
Thanks, this is great, I'll discuss this with the other editors next time we talk!
Thanks @aaronpk As this is a draft PR I'm really open to improvements.
cc: @peppelinux
@aaronpk the IETF Using TLS in Applications wg is working on that https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-uta-rfc7525bis-00 we could ping them too. In the meanwhile I think this PR improves the readability of the current document.
I like the editorial improvements. Since this contains normative changes in #40 it is pending that discussion.
@aaronpk let me know if/when you need a rebase.
@ioggstream the group agreed to the normative change of requiring HTTPS for redirect URIs so I would like to merge this PR. Could you rebase it to fix the merge conflicts? Thanks!
@aaronpk sure, but it will take some days :P hope it's not an issue...
No problem, thanks!
Closing in favor of #98
This PR
Reorganize TLS parts: