Closed obi-bot closed 7 years ago
Edman degradation is already there. Asserting Mass spectrometry under sequencing sounds wrong to me, rather rely on defined classes
Original comment by: proccaserra
I meant using a defined class.
Original comment by: helenp
done
Original comment by: proccaserra
Original comment by: proccaserra
Missing subsumption. Think DNA sequencing should be a child of process 'sequencing'. Would make sense to add N-terminal sequencing/Edman degradation and mass spec as additional child terms.
Reported by: helenp
Original Ticket: obi/obi-terms/175