obi-bot
commented
14 years ago Asserted as planned processes in 2397. Work still needs to be done to make these be defined in terms of objectives
Original comment by: alanruttenberg
Closed obi-bot closed 11 months ago
obi-bot
commented
14 years ago Asserted as planned processes in 2397. Work still needs to be done to make these be defined in terms of objectives
Original comment by: alanruttenberg
obi-bot
commented
14 years ago open as some should be objective defined . need better defs for the obkectives
Original comment by: helenp
obi-bot
commented
14 years ago Original comment by: helenp
----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Ruttenberg" <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> To: "Bjoern Peters" <bpeters@liai.org>, "Melanie Courtot" <mcourtot@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 10:24:17 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: process cleaning
There are a bunch of terms that are under process directly, even after inferred.
These seem unequivocally planned processes. Agree?
interpreting data presentation of stimulus protein expression profiling (should be objective-defined) protein-protein interaction detection (should be objective-defined) transcription factor binding site identification (should be objective-defined) validation (should be objective-defined) inter-rater reliability (bad name - submitted ticket)
These I'm not sure, but I think so. You?
nucleic acid hybridization immunization exposure to material in environment acquisition
I'd like to fix this as it makes it easier to do the processual business.
-Alan
Bjoern: Agreed that this should be fixed. I went through them, and 'immunization' is not intended to be planned processes, all the others are.
Reported by: alanruttenberg
Original Ticket: obi/obi-terms/343