Closed obi-bot closed 7 years ago
I removed the NamedIndividual declaration from OBO_imports.owl in commit 4079. That will fix the problem for OBI for now.
Then I looked deeper and found that OntoFox consistently includes the declaration. I can see it in their SPARQL database: http://www.ontobee.org/sparql
SELECT distinct ?p ?o
WHERE {
GRAPH <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/merged/UBERON>
{ <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0002367> ?p ?o }
}
But I don't see it in the UBERON OWL files. Weird. I'll ask Chris Mungall.
Original comment by: jamesaoverton
Not in uberon AFAICT.
Btw, still in SF? I advise migrating before it gets harder... https://github.com/cmungall/gosf2github/
Original comment by: cmungall
All puns in ontobee:
prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#>
prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#>
SELECT *
WHERE {
GRAPH ?g
{ ?x rdf:type owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdf:type owl:Class }
}
I assume there is some pattern here, but I'm stumped
Original comment by: cmungall
Ontobee developer Edison has re-uploaded the UBERON ontology. There is no individual now. Need to rerun Ontofox and check whether the output is correct.
Original comment by: zhengj2007
Original comment by: jamesaoverton
Looks good now.
Original comment by: jamesaoverton
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0002367 prostate gland imported as both class and instance see: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/obi/dev/import/OBO_imports.owl
Need to check whether it is cause by ontoFox bug or UBERON issue.
Need to be fixed in OBI release
Reported by: zhengj2007
Original Ticket: obi/obi-terms/822