objectionary / eo-vscode

VSCode Extension for the EO Language with a Language Server
https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=eolang.eo
MIT License
6 stars 0 forks source link

Update dependency @types/node to v16.18.119 #56

Open renovate[bot] opened 1 year ago

renovate[bot] commented 1 year ago

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@types/node (source) 16.11.36 -> 16.18.119 age adoption passing confidence

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

â™» Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.



This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

cr-gpt[bot] commented 1 year ago

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

pr-codex[bot] commented 1 year ago

Tldr

Updated version of "@types/node" package from 16.11.36 to 16.18.23.

Detailed summary

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 year ago

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

github-advanced-security[bot] commented 1 year ago

You have successfully added a new SonarCloud configuration ``. As part of the setup process, we have scanned this repository and found no existing alerts. In the future, you will see all code scanning alerts on the repository Security tab.

yegor256 commented 1 year ago

@rultor please, try to merge

rultor commented 1 year ago

@rultor please, try to merge

@yegor256 OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

rultor commented 1 year ago

@rultor please, try to merge

@renovate[bot] @yegor256 Oops, I failed. You can see the full log here (spent 14s)

+ set -e
+ set -o pipefail
++ dirname ./run.sh
+ cd .
+ echo 125307
+ echo '1.74.7 b768e876f'
1.74.7 b768e876f
+ date
Mon 03 Apr 2023 07:32:10 PM CEST
+ uptime
 19:32:10 up 131 days, 10 min,  0 users,  load average: 0.30, 0.09, 0.11
+ cat
com.rultor.spi.Profile: There is no 'merge' section in .rultor.yml for branch master in repo objectionary/eo-vscode
    at com.rultor.agents.req.StartsRequest.docker(StartsRequest.java:350)
    at com.rultor.agents.req.StartsRequest.vars(StartsRequest.java:255)
    at com.rultor.agents.req.StartsRequest.script(StartsRequest.java:148)
    at com.rultor.agents.req.StartsRequest.process(StartsRequest.java:109)
    at com.rultor.agents.AbstractAgent.execute(AbstractAgent.java:70)
    at com.rultor.spi.Agent.execute(Agent.java:84)
    at com.rultor.Routine.process(Routine.java:202)
    at com.rultor.Routine.unsafe_aroundBody0(Routine.java:180)
    at com.rultor.Routine.run(Routine.java:1)
    at org.aspectj.runtime.reflect.JoinPointImpl.proceed(JoinPointImpl.java:179)
    at com.jcabi.aspects.aj.MethodInterrupter.wrap(MethodInterrupter.java:108)
    at com.rultor.Routine.unsafe(Routine.java:175)
    at com.rultor.Routine.run(Routine.java:142)
    at com.jcabi.log.VerboseRunnable.run(VerboseRunnable.java:190)
    at com.jcabi.aspects.aj.MethodScheduler.lambda./run.sh(MethodScheduler.java:194)
    at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors.call(Executors.java:539)
    at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:305)
    at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:305)
    at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1136)
    at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:635)
    at com.jcabi.log.VerboseThreads.run(VerboseThreads.java:222)
    at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)

+ exit -1
'cid' file is absent, most probably the Docker container wasn't started correctly
sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 year ago

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 year ago

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarCloud.

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 year ago

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarCloud.

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 year ago

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarCloud.

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 year ago

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 year ago

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 year ago

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 year ago

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarCloud.

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 year ago

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarCloud.

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 year ago

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 year ago

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarCloud.

sonarcloud[bot] commented 11 months ago

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

sonarcloud[bot] commented 11 months ago

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarCloud.

sonarcloud[bot] commented 11 months ago

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

sonarcloud[bot] commented 10 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 10 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 10 months ago

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 9 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 9 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 9 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 9 months ago

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 9 months ago

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 9 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 9 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 8 months ago

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 8 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 8 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 8 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 7 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 6 months ago

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 4 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 3 months ago

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 3 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 3 months ago

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 2 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Please retry analysis of this Pull-Request directly on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 week ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 week ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud