"good-first-task" -> "good first issue"

volodya-lombrozo commented 4 months ago

good-first-task is a good and well-understandable label for the appropriate type of issues. However, recent changes on GitHub allow the use of a special label, good first issue:

It seems, that this label will work better than good-first-task.

volodya-lombrozo commented 4 months ago

@yegor256 Could you take a look, please?

github-actions[bot] commented 4 months ago

@volodya-lombrozo thanks for the report, here is a feedback:

Problems

The bug report does not provide a clear description of the issue, despite references to "good-first-task" and "good first issue". The specific problem with these labels is not clearly defined.
A detailed, step-by-step procedure to replicate the issue is missing from the report. A comprehensive bug report should outline the steps required to reproduce the issue, assisting developers in understanding the problem more effectively.
Essential information about the environment in which the bug was encountered is absent from the report. Details such as the browser used, the operating system, and the version of the software where the bug was detected are key for successful debugging.

I would recommend adding a clear, precise description of the issue and its impact on the system's use.

Please fix the bug report in order it to get resolved faster. Analyzed with gpt-4

yegor256 commented 4 months ago

@volodya-lombrozo renamed

objectionary / eo

"good-first-task" -> "good first issue" #3211

Problems