feat(#714): Simplify JeoFqn and EoFqn Objects Usage

[volodya-lombrozo]

In this PR I successfully simplified the usage of JeoFqn and EoFqn objects. Now we create them only in rare cases in a few objects. To reduce duplication among Directives* classes I added DirectivesEoObject, DirectivesJeoObject, DirectivesAbstractObject. Exactely these clases use JeoFqn and EoFqn.

Closes: #714. History:

• feat(#714): add DirectivesJeoObject class
• feat(#714): refactor several classes
• feat(#714): refactor DirectivesSeq classes
• feat(#714): refactor more classes
• feat(#714): refactor more classes
• feat(#714): change parameters order in DirectivesValue
• feat(#714): use DirectivesJeoObject in all the possible cases
• feat(#714): add DirectivesAbstractObject class
• feat(#714): use DirectivesAbstractObject in DirectivesClass
• feat(#714): use DirectivesAbstractObject in all the possible cases
• feat(#714): add javadocs
• feat(#714): refactor DirectivesClass
• feat(#714): remove mutability from DirectivesProgram
• feat(#714): fix all the code offences

---

PR-Codex overview

This PR focuses on refactoring the Directives classes in the EO language representation by modifying constructors, enhancing object-oriented design, and improving the clarity of directive creation.

Detailed summary

• Changed visibility of several constructors from public to private.
• Modified the order of parameters in constructor calls for DirectivesProgram, DirectivesClass, and others.
• Replaced withClass and withMethod methods with direct constructor usage.
• Introduced DirectivesAbstractObject and DirectivesEoObject classes for better abstraction.
• Updated the iterator methods to use new directive object structures.
• Improved handling of nullable parameters in DirectivesTryCatch.
• Adjusted parameter handling in DirectivesValue constructors for consistency.

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

[volodya-lombrozo]

@rultor merge

[rultor]

@rultor merge

@volodya-lombrozo OK, I'll try to merge now. You can check the progress of the merge here

[rultor]

@rultor merge

@volodya-lombrozo Done! FYI, the full log is here (took me 32min)

[0crat]

@volodya-lombrozo Thanks for the contribution! You've earned +4 points for this: +4 as a basis; -8 for too many hits-of-code (1125 >= 200); -16 for way too many hits-of-code (1125 >= 800); -16 for the lack of code review; -4 for very few (2) comments; +44 to give you at least something. Please, keep them coming. Your running balance is +96.