Ivan gave feedback: EO examples are too simple, hence they fold into simple values. Need a bigger example.
Nikolay suggests to make up a larger example.
According to Nikolay and Maxim, there is no syntatic support for (?)some representation of bytes(?).
Normalizer team had to roll back some stdout results.
In general, we do not know if we can safely dataize some object. Counter example with multiplication table where normalization cannot optimize anything.
We will check how much normalization can help with multiplication table.
Yegor suggests to postpone large example to later phases and now continue the work on normalizer.
Yegor wonders how they can keep typing information in EO. They could be kept as separate objects, however they might get destroyed by the normalization process. However, Yegor wishes to keep some semantic information from Java Bytecode (https://github.com/objectionary/normalizer/issues/409).
Danila's notes
Realistic example
Problem
Solution 1: try the multiplication table example
link
Problems:
Solution 2: artificial example
Solution 3: do more
Tests
Global object
Anatoliy's notes