Open cmungall opened 6 years ago
I have no objection, as long as it's well documented which cell types live in which ontology.
But it would be good to make sure it's OK with @dianeoinglis too, since I've really only worked with a few yeasts until now.
I have no objection.
Reciprocal: https://github.com/obophenotype/cell-ontology/issues/447
We could keep the cell types in CL, but IMO it's cleaner if CL is pan-metazoan, and FAO becomes analogous to PO, which gross anat and cell types in one integrated ontology for a clade.
If FAO developers agree I can make a PR