Closed cmungall closed 5 years ago
@cmungall for me all three of these terms are clearly morphology -- the divide is basically between items that can be in principle observed in a snapshot and those for which a time course is necessary.
As for PATO, ectopic is definitely morphology for the organism with ectopic X, and I guess it is a modeling decision whether ectopic is also morphology for X, but I would suggest that this would be the most consistent way of doing things.
I do not understand your distinction between structural and morphological -- I thought that these words are nearly synonymous, e.g. Wikipedia: Morphology is a branch of biology dealing with the study of the form and structure of organisms and their specific structural features.
I like your distinction, it is very clear and easy to apply.
I had thought morphology was used in a more restrictive sense in some ontologies but I may be wrong.
It seems that PATO needs some work here as it's conception of morphology is much more restricted than how it is used in HP and MP. E.g. PATO does not include color or ectopic under morphology, in contrast to how it is used in HP, MP, TO and others. cc @matentzn @dosumis
@cmungall Should we move this discussion to the PATO tracker? I have had a look at the hierarchy near here and think it is OK.
yep - can you organize the pato morphology tickets @nicolevasilevsky ?
Yes, will do!
I created a ticket in the PATO tracker, I will close this here
HPO term
HP:0410042 Abnormal liver morphology
Suggested revision and reasons
Current def is "Any structural anomaly of the bile-secreting organ ", which maybe encompasses more than is meant by morphology in other domains?
these are some of the subclasses:
These aren't subclasses in the pato sense of morphological. It may be that this is the hierarchy clinicians expect but in this case we should include some kind of internal curator note and use a different pato class in the definition, which is currently