Closed pnrobinson closed 1 year ago
Serum sickness and Serum sickness-like reaction (SSLR) are different clinical entities and triggered by different substances. There is some discussion in https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559122/, notably "The precise mechanism of SSLR remains unclear; however, there could be a potential role of drug metabolites that are directly toxic to the cells. The features of serum sickness, such as vasculitis and glomerulonephritis, are not present in SSLR."
It seems like the name of the diseases is what needs changing; SSLR should get a name that more clearly distinguishes it from serum sickness.
@MickeySegal
I am not convinced that History of medications associated with
The way we use such findings is that if a disease triggered by such a medication is in the differential diagnosis, our Usefulness algorithm asks whether such a medication was used. It is more of a correlation analysis than a statement about pathophysiology, though often the reason for the correlation is pathophysiology. For natural language processing, the important part of the finding is the list of medications, and if one is found in the records, this will increase the chance of finding a drug-associated problem.
New term request History of medications associated with serum sickness-like reaction (segal_220420133426): Cefaclor, amoxicillin, sulfonamides, tetracyclines, ciprofloxacin, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), barbiturates, carbamazepine, propranolol, thiouracil, and allopurinol