Closed DitchingIt closed 5 months ago
For some more context: All of these terms are phenotypes in their own respect - they don't belong in an ontology of behavioural processes.
@rays22 please coordinate this with @sbello and @LCCarmody during your reconciliation session. The default should always be to simply drop the EQ, but if you can find better patterns that would be great.
@matentzn @rays22 -- can we implement?
I will work on this next week. I meet with @rays22 then
Hi everybody, this seems the wrong tracker for this term. The HPO has much more detailed terms for behavioral abnormalities.
and so on ...
I documented the remaining EQs here:
The NBO is planning to retire its Phenotype branch (no date set yet). We are aware that HP has been using 19 terms from this branch. We would encourage you to review these. I recommend tagging @matentzn in follow-up comments, not least if you need a technical discussion. NB: MP is in a similar position regarding the two starred * classes and you may want to consider a common solution.