obophenotype / ncbitaxon

Build for NCBITaxon
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
25 stars 7 forks source link

Remove extra # symbol from IRIs of some taxonomic rank terms? #96

Open allenbaron opened 8 months ago

allenbaron commented 8 months ago

Three taxonomic rank terms appear to have an extra # in their IRIs:

  1. http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCBITaxon#_species_group
  2. http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCBITaxon#_species_subgroup
  3. http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCBITaxon#_taxonomic_rank

All other taxonomic rank IRIs use the prefix http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCBITaxon_.

Should the extra # be removed from these IRIs?

Noting that none of the taxonomic rank terms have IRIs that resolve.

balhoff commented 8 months ago

Should NCBITaxon use identifiers from the OBO TAXRANK ontology?

cmungall commented 8 months ago

taxrank is probably a bigger decision, but I think it makes sense. Made a distinct issue #97

The odd URI issue is an unfortunate but known consequence of

It was probably a mistake for us to place the subsets directly in the NCBITaxon namespace, we don't own this. Should have been done the same way as go/uberon/doid/etc, which is suboptimal but predictable.

The decision is

  1. leave as is for now and make a bigger change to taxrank (#97) later
  2. change the namespace for the subset to be obo:ncbitaxon# (fixing the weirdness issue)