Open allenbaron opened 10 months ago
Should NCBITaxon use identifiers from the OBO TAXRANK ontology?
taxrank is probably a bigger decision, but I think it makes sense. Made a distinct issue #97
The odd URI issue is an unfortunate but known consequence of
It was probably a mistake for us to place the subsets directly in the NCBITaxon namespace, we don't own this. Should have been done the same way as go/uberon/doid/etc, which is suboptimal but predictable.
The decision is
obo:ncbitaxon#
(fixing the weirdness issue)
Three taxonomic rank terms appear to have an extra
#
in their IRIs:All other taxonomic rank IRIs use the prefix
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCBITaxon_
.Should the extra
#
be removed from these IRIs?Noting that none of the taxonomic rank terms have IRIs that resolve.