Closed cmungall closed 10 years ago
Hello Chris, This relation is for links to the Symptom ontology Cheers, Lynn
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2014, at 11:44 PM, Chris Mungall notifications@github.com wrote:
to HPO
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Is there a reason not to use HP here?
On 14 Apr 2014, at 4:20, lschriml wrote:
Hello Chris, This relation is for links to the Symptom ontology Cheers, Lynn
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2014, at 11:44 PM, Chris Mungall notifications@github.com wrote:
to HPO
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/obophenotype/human-disease-ontology/issues/4#issuecomment-40355667
The concept of a phenotype in HPO and a symptom in DO and SYMP are different and distinctive. We are reporting clinical symptoms. Examples: fatigue, pain, nausea, blurred vision.
SYMP and HPO do have a few terms that overlap. I would like to link to HPO for phenotypic abnormalities, for skeletal and genetic diseases. This makes sense for diseases where there is the genotype - phenotype relationship.
However, in DO we are reporting the common symptoms reported by patients for each disease, and we define symptom as A perceived change in function, sensation or appearance reported by a patient indicative of a disease
Cheers, Lynn
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 14, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Chris Mungall notifications@github.com wrote:
Is there a reason not to use HP here?
On 14 Apr 2014, at 4:20, lschriml wrote:
Hello Chris, This relation is for links to the Symptom ontology Cheers, Lynn
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2014, at 11:44 PM, Chris Mungall notifications@github.com wrote:
to HPO
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/obophenotype/human-disease-ontology/issues/4#issuecomment-40355667 — Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
to HPO