Closed shawntanzk closed 2 years ago
Related to #16
Make sure these are fixe wherever they come from, not just in PCL
also use ROBOT 1.8.2 (latest ODK) for generating the report.
Recommendation: do the report check on the base, not the edit file (neither the full ontology)
on base file, only error (besides the duplicate_label in gene names and old false CL terms) is that CL:0000881 is missing_label -> on checking the full and edit file, the label is there so don't think its a real problem.
Don't worry about anything else. OBO dashboard looks at base
CL:0000881 is a old pcl term - annotations will get cleared when it gets deleted and robot report will clean
All local errors fixed
I created a release to check ROBOT report with base file import and a few errors that need to be addressed:
RO and BFO terms have multiplied labels with
@en
attached, example: (of note: RO:000053 still has old bearer_of label) Not sure where this is coming from cause on RO it seems alrightUBERON has some multipled_equivalent_classes error - these are accurate in UBERON itself: