Open cmungall opened 11 years ago
I think that use of pectoral or pelvic fin folds may not represent the developing fin bud or some precursor, but rather a part of the adult structure, and as such would be treated differently than the median fin folds, which give rise to the medial fins. to do- read http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925477398001762
Can we say that this new term was added at some point? https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ols/ontologies/uberon/terms?iri=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.obolibrary.org%2Fobo%2FUBERON_2005316
We should have a generic "fin fold" class. Note that neither TAO nor ZFA have this.
ext inherits a fairly minimal set of logical axioms from TAO:
Can we come up with a logical definition template for "X fin fold"?
Is an X fin fold always part of an X (currently it is for pectoral, but not the others? Or does it develop in to an X? If it develops into an X, can it also be part of an X?