Closed cmungall closed 10 years ago
Would it make sense to have a term such as "supernumerary" that could be used in cases of extra digits, digital elements, etc.?
Robert E. Druzinsky, Ph.D. Clinical Associate Professor Dept. of Oral Biology College of Dentistry University of Illinois at Chicago 801 S. Paulina Chicago, IL 60612 druzinsk@uic.edu
Office: 312-996-0406 Lab: 312-996-0629
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Chris Mungall notifications@github.comwrote:
This term is obviously not appropriate and should be obsoleted:
[Term] id: UBERON:4200187 name: hyperphalangy of manus namespace: none def: "Increase the number of phalanges per digit beyond their ancestral digitalnformulas. Modified from Cooper and Dawson 2009" [] is_a: UBERON:0002389 ! manual digit
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/obophenotype/uberon/issues/442 .
Yes, "supernumerary" is a synonym for
This is used to define terms in phenotype ontologies e.g.
Fixed with r4085 in ext
This term is obviously not appropriate and should be obsoleted: