Closed drseb closed 7 years ago
The most common cause of this is two separate uberon imports in the chain, each coming from different versions. Need a quicker way to analyze these than looking in Protege..
@nicolevasilevsky can you take a look and generate an explanation, and see if the axioms are coming from 2 places?
@cmungall Why are there disjointness axioms in uberon? I thought we remove them for the import purpose?
They're there for detecting errors. I don't recall removing them in imports. On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 10:19 Sebastian Köhler notifications@github.com wrote:
[image: screen shot 2017-05-15 at 19 18 08] https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/5172897/26070022/521bc1a6-39a3-11e7-8ebd-50ba8abf3d18.png
@cmungall https://github.com/cmungall Why are there disjointness axioms in uberon? I thought we remove them for the import purpose?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/obophenotype/upheno/issues/229#issuecomment-301542196, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADGORIf0OduedT6iPtd4XTCyLKSTaZ7ks5r6IkfgaJpZM4NbWMr .
Related ticket: https://github.com/obophenotype/uberon/issues/1189
It looks like there is a very stale set of uberon axioms kicking around in the import chain, conj-sac hasn't been part of the eyeball since 2015: https://github.com/obophenotype/uberon/commit/914304d75a48ed17a9edb175be36bbc60f9666f2
fixed
Hi,
with the re-run of make imports/xxx.owl, we are now having issues with logic inconsistencies. See e.g. https://travis-ci.org/obophenotype/human-phenotype-ontology/jobs/232460614 or http://build.berkeleybop.org/job/build-hp-edit/1946/console
This comes from one of the re-mireoted ontologies, i.e. chebi or uberon or GO.
Any ideas how to quickly fix this @cmungall ?