I propose the establishment of a workgroup between @rays22 and @LCCarmody for the purpose of reviewing HPO. This is how I envision this to work:
We match pattern by pattern in an ongoing fashion (this is now standard in ODK and I already have implemented this today for HPO)
We copy 5 patterns at once in a Google Sheet and have @LCCarmody review it
Once reviewed, we use the "pattern merge workflow" to factor the updated definitions in hpo-edit.owl (remember, we are not using dosdp patterns directly in HPO)
We keep a new directory "src/patterns/data/reviewed" where we copy all of the matched patterns after review is finished
We keep matching-updating reviewed patterns so that changes can be monitored by @LCCarmody over time
Steps to get started:
[x] Upload first 5 templates from src/patterns/data/matches to a Google sheet and share with @LCCarmody
[ ] Set up a weekly call with @LCCarmody to discuss findings
I propose the establishment of a workgroup between @rays22 and @LCCarmody for the purpose of reviewing HPO. This is how I envision this to work:
Steps to get started:
src/patterns/data/matches
to a Google sheet and share with @LCCarmodyAre you ok with this @LCCarmody and @rays22?