The definition currently is (coming from ZFIN EQs):
'has part' some
(absent and ('inheres in' some
('intersegmental vessel' and ('part of' some 'thoracic duct'))) and ('has modifier' some abnormal))
The problem is this:
lymphatic vessel is disjoint with blood vessel.
However, the bearer above (('intersegmental vessel' and ('part of' some 'thoracic duct'))) is both a blood vessel (an intersegmental vessel is a blood vessel according to ZFA) AND a lymphatic vessel:
A lymphatic vessel is equivalentTo: a vessel that is part of some lymph vasculature.
the intersegemental vessel is obviously a vessel.
... and it is also part of the lymph vasculature, because
3.1. thoracic duct is a lymphatic vessel and 3.2.thoracic ductis part of thelymph vasculature`.
I dont know anatomy well enough to fix this, but @ybradford maybe you can see how to fix.
The definition currently is (coming from ZFIN EQs):
The problem is this: lymphatic vessel is disjoint with blood vessel.
However, the bearer above (
('intersegmental vessel' and ('part of' some 'thoracic duct'))
) is both a blood vessel (an intersegmental vessel is a blood vessel according to ZFA) AND a lymphatic vessel:lymph vasculature
, because 3.1.thoracic duct
is alymphatic vessel and 3.2.
thoracic ductis part of the
lymph vasculature`.I dont know anatomy well enough to fix this, but @ybradford maybe you can see how to fix.