New Relations Request from the SCDO

[JadeHotchkiss]

We have a list of 38 new object properties that we're using in our ontology (the Sickle cell Disease Ontology) and would like you to consider including them in the RO. The list of properties to be considered can be found and commented on here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KyBwzh2EUi2zhGGBOTR5FERvmDxHzkRm3OIKN_2G3ss/edit?usp=sharing

Included in the spreadsheet:

• SCDO ID
• Property Name
• Text Description
• Inverse Properties
• Suggested Superproperty

Any suggestions would be appreciated, especially:

• Did we miss any existing object properties that could be used instead of our new ones?
• Can any names/labels be improved?
• Do any definitions need to be reworded (e.g. to be more broadly applied yet still specific enough)?

Thanks in advance! Jade Hotchkiss (SCDO curator)

[cmungall]

Thanks! I suggest we split this list in two, @mbrush would you be able to look at the disease/genotype relations? @jamesaoverton would an OBI person be able to look at the ones pertaining to devices or diagnoses?

[kshefchek]

+1, https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ols/ontologies/scdo/properties?iri=http%3A%2F%2Fscdontology.h3abionet.org%2Fontology%2FSCDO_0000468 would be useful for monarch in linking phenotypes to HPO age of onset classes and literals

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue has not seen any activity in the past 2 years. It will be closed automatically 60 days from now if no action is taken.