Closed wdduncan closed 1 year ago
When I read this on slack I was hoping this would relate the measurement process, not its output, to the characteristic. But I guess we could get both?
Sorry not following ...
I requested this term as a first step to allow for shortcut relations of the form:
process
-- output--> datum
-- is characteristic measurement of --> characteristic
Did I misunderstand your need?
Yes, I understand.. I was hoping for something direct, like:
process
-- output of which is characteristic measurement of --> characteristic
How about the label has output that measures characteristic
, and the inverse characteristic is measured by output of
?
A definition will be needed too. I know you don't work on content, though :)
Once is characteristic measurement of
is added, we can define the the property chain:
has output
o is characteristic measurement of
Its a mouthful.. But not too bad! I think I could get behind it! Thanks for suggestion.
@wdduncan can you put a concrete example of process -- output--> datum -- is characteristic measurement of --> characteristic
on the issue header please?
@cthoyt This issue is for adding is characteristic measurement of
. Although we've been discussion the addition of has output that measures characteristic
(or whatever it will be called), adding this relation should go in a separate issue. Do you want to submit the separate issue?
Add
is measurement of characteristic
to be more generic than IAO'sis quality measurement of
. E.g., processes can have characteristics, and this would allow the process in the range of the relations.