Closed marvin1099 closed 2 months ago
I've analyzed the video file you uploaded. It is in fact CQP 22. The smooth scrolling background has some visible macroblocking, and I assume that is what you're referring to. Unfortunately, that is expected with 8bit limited range, smooth gradients.
OBS and the NVENC encoder is doing is functioning as requested (settings are respected), so I don't think this could be considered a bug.
I've analyzed the video file you uploaded. It is in fact CQP 22. The smooth scrolling background has some visible macroblocking, and I assume that is what you're referring to. Unfortunately, that is expected with 8bit limited range, smooth gradients.
OBS and the NVENC encoder is doing is functioning as requested (settings are respected), so I don't think this could be considered a bug.
Ok strange since in other recording ways this problem did not appear on -qp 22
Maby it was my mistake after all the problem seems to appear on custom ffmpeg output -qp 22
too, could have sworn it worked, hmm.
O well i guess i have to go lower then 22 in that case thanks anyway.
Operating System Info
Other
Other OS
Arch Linux
OBS Studio Version
30.2.0-beta4
OBS Studio Version (Other)
No response
OBS Studio Log URL
https://obsproject.com/logs/pZw6kleDujHbpG43
OBS Studio Crash Log URL
No response
Expected Behavior
When recording using the cqp option in the
NVIDIA NVENC HEVC
the quality should be high enough to not have any artifacts visible to the eye.Current Behavior
The poor quality is clearly visible, here the small video recorded with cqp 22: https://github.com/obsproject/obs-studio/assets/40715852/c15c159e-3bf7-4a0b-8dd2-d9a3eed4fbc4
Steps to Reproduce
NVIDIA NVENC HEVC
cqp
Anything else we should know?
I think it will always results in poor quality no mater what value is entered for cqp Edit: It seems a lower cqp value still makes the quality go higher,
but the expected good quality is way higher than using -qp,
not sure if this i intended i always used qp 22 but in obs it seems it needs to be lower