Closed rgrinberg closed 4 years ago
That definitely seems like a mistake.
Ah but wait, doesn't that mean the code is vulnerable to addition to the Result
module now? I remember this was a problem for some packages in the past.
@rgrinberg I'll revert that part. For the copy in Dune that won't be an issue soon as we will bump the lower bound on OCaml to 4.08. In the meantime, we can simply add a sed
operation in the update script.
I'm also making a bugfix release.
I'm not sure why it was included in the interface, but it seems like it shouldn't belong there.
Also, I've changed the result module to be used without changing the code. This makes it easier to embed csexp in places where
result
isn't present.