Closed Sudha247 closed 3 years ago
Would it be useful to change the num_domains
parameter as num_additional_domains
to make it explicit? This is a breaking change. @ctk21 what are your thoughts?
I can see a clarity advantage to cleaning that up to num_additional_domains
(or num_workers
) because I can see it being confusing as it is.
We will probably need to make a release of domainslib soon that switches us from using critical_section
to Mutex
/Condition
, so getting the change in for that release might make sense.
Looks good to me.
Mentions that we actually create a pool of
num_domains + 1
along with the parent domain.