Open jmid opened 2 months ago
Saw this on ppc64le 5.2 too in #469 https://ocaml-multicoretests.ci.dev:8100/job/2024-09-03/111022-ci-ocluster-build-4bdab6
random seed: 461619666
generated error fail pass / total time test name
[ ] 0 0 0 0 / 1000 0.0s STM Sys test sequential
[ ] 0 0 0 0 / 1000 0.0s STM Sys test sequential (generating)
[✓] 1000 0 0 1000 / 1000 3.9s STM Sys test sequential
[ ] 0 0 0 0 / 200 0.0s STM Sys test parallel
[ ] 50 0 0 50 / 200 63.4s STM Sys test parallel (shrinking: 3.0003)
[ ] 50 0 0 50 / 200 124.1s STM Sys test parallel (shrinking: 7.0002)
[✗] 51 0 1 50 / 200 180.0s STM Sys test parallel
[ ] 0 0 0 0 / 1000 0.0s STM Sys stress test parallel
[ ] 27 0 0 27 / 1000 4.1s STM Sys stress test parallel
[ ] 514 0 0 514 / 1000 64.2s STM Sys stress test parallel
[ ] 953 0 0 953 / 1000 124.2s STM Sys stress test parallel
[✓] 1000 0 0 1000 / 1000 129.3s STM Sys stress test parallel
--- Failure --------------------------------------------------------------------
Test STM Sys test parallel failed (28 shrink steps):
|
Mkdir ([], "eee")
|
.---------------------.
| |
Readdir [] Mkdir ([], "ddd")
Rmdir ([], "eee")
+++ Messages ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Messages for test STM Sys test parallel:
Results incompatible with linearized model
|
Mkdir ([], "eee") : Ok (())
|
.------------------------------------.
| |
Readdir [] : Ok ([||]) Mkdir ([], "ddd") : Ok (())
Rmdir ([], "eee") : Ok (())
================================================================================
failure (1 tests failed, 0 tests errored, ran 3 tests)
File "src/sys/dune", line 4, characters 7-16:
4 | (name stm_tests)
^^^^^^^^^
(cd _build/default/src/sys && ./stm_tests.exe --verbose)
Command exited with code 1.
The
STM Sys test parallel test
on s390x with OCaml 5.1.0 found an unexpected counterexample: https://ocaml-multicoretests.ci.dev:8100/job/2024-07-05/135811-ci-ocluster-build-a950abCurrently we consider the test positive on Linux and run only 200 iterations. As such, it should be commended to find a counterexample in only 58 attempts... :smile: