Closed moyodiallo closed 2 months ago
I'm not sure what I'm missing, but why do we need a new constructor instead of just adding the list to `internal
? Similarly, I'm not sure why having to display an error with --cygwin-packages=CYGWIN_PACKAGES
specified on it own is better than --cygwin-internal-install=[CYGWIN_PACKAGES]
?
I'm not sure what I'm missing, but why do we need a new constructor instead of just adding the list to
`internal
? Similarly, I'm not sure why having to display an error with--cygwin-packages=CYGWIN_PACKAGES
specified on it own is better than--cygwin-internal-install=[CYGWIN_PACKAGES]
?
--cygwin-internal-install
, --cygwin-local-install
flags are already grouped together and we could let that as it is. Doing --cygwin-internal-install=[CYGWIN_PACKAGES]
is going split them and make them separate options.
Perhaps
--cygwin-extra-packages
is a better name?
While it's a bit longer to write, i think i agree with that.
Perhaps
--cygwin-extra-packages
is a better name?While it's a bit longer to write, i think i agree with that.
Yep, It brings more context.
I haven't seen no mention about testing it. Did someone test it ?
I forgot to note but I've tested it when I reviewed installing packages (non installed, already installed, unknown) and some argument incompatibility. @kit-ty-kate is doing further tests.
worked fine. It suffers from https://github.com/ocaml/opam/issues/5839 and https://github.com/ocaml/opam/issues/5952 but those are separate issues. Thanks a lot!
Fixes #5834.
Instead of reusing
--cygwin-internal-install
, it is more suitable to have new option (--cygwin-packages=CYGWIN_PACKAGES
), to avoid ending up checking the exclusion between--cygwin-internal-install
and--cygwin-local-install
.