Closed NoraLoose closed 2 years ago
@gustavo-marques, I solved the previous problem. There was nothing wrong with the code, I just forgot to set THICKNESSDIFFUSE = True
. I updated the comment above.
But I noticed another problem. Here is what I give the model versus what the diagnostic KHTH_t
gives me:
Is the spurious "tile structure" on the right implied by MOM_read_data
?
Alistair (@adcroft), maybe you have seen the problem described in the previous comment before?
That looks like a classic missing halo-update. I don't think MOM_read_data()
fills the halo. You are interpolating to the edge of the compute domain which is using a halo value of zero (if initialized) rather than the correct value from the neighbouring processor. Try adding a pass_var()
after reading the data.
Thanks @adcroft - this solved the problem!
Merging #24 (31c35ce) into dev/cpt (d8fc2ef) will decrease coverage by
0.00%
. The diff coverage is35.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev/cpt #24 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 29.04% 29.04% -0.01%
===========================================
Files 244 244
Lines 71849 71856 +7
===========================================
+ Hits 20869 20870 +1
- Misses 50980 50986 +6
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
...arameterizations/lateral/MOM_thickness_diffuse.F90 | 31.34% <35.00%> (+0.03%) |
:arrow_up: |
src/framework/MOM_restart.F90 | 25.68% <0.00%> (-0.27%) |
:arrow_down: |
config_src/drivers/solo_driver/MOM_driver.F90 | 67.88% <0.00%> (-0.14%) |
:arrow_down: |
src/ocean_data_assim/MOM_oda_driver.F90 | 0.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
|
src/user/baroclinic_zone_initialization.F90 | 0.00% <0.00%> (ø) |
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.
@gustavo-marques @adcroft is this PR of interest for the MOM6 code (upstream)?
If so, it will take some work to merge it because I started from the dev/cpt branch, which has significantly diverged from the upstream master branch.
I successfully tested the new code for the NeverWorld2 setup, but I have to admit I have never compiled or run MOM6 in a more complex configuration. Gustavo, do you have a working (and up to date) setup on Cheyenne that we could use for testing?
Hi @NoraLoose: yes, I think we should merge this PR to the main branch eventually. I can take care of that and if I get conflicts related to the changes in this PR I will reach out to you. Thanks!
@gustavo-marques have you tried merging this yet? If not, I will try and reach out to you if I get stuck. Thanks!
No, I have not.
Closing this PR because I have opened it at NOAA/GFDL.
This adds the option to read a spatially varying GM interface height diffusivity (KHTH) from a netcdf file.