This issue is to discuss the comparison of CM2.6 and CESM results. This likely doesn't need much discussion, but I think it's nice to add here so we can track and come back it easily in the future!
CM 2.6
CESM
Observations
All subplots look very similar across models! Hooray! This means that our results are robust across models.
The magnitudes are larger in CESM ql in both the full resolution and small scale fluxes. This likely translates to a similar overall percentage of small scale flux effects.
The magnitude of qh full resolution in CESM is smaller, but the small scale flux is the same magnitude as in CM2.6 - this suggests an even larger role of small scales in this case
The histograms of qh in CESM show a more noticeable "bump" to the left of 0 than in CM2.6 - do we know what that "bump" is?
NOTE: CESM results are only across 2 years, whereas CM2.6 results are across 20.
This issue is to discuss the comparison of CM2.6 and CESM results. This likely doesn't need much discussion, but I think it's nice to add here so we can track and come back it easily in the future!
CM 2.6
CESM
Observations
qlin both the full resolution and small scale fluxes. This likely translates to a similar overall percentage of small scale flux effects.qhfull resolution in CESM is smaller, but the small scale flux is the same magnitude as in CM2.6 - this suggests an even larger role of small scales in this caseqhin CESM show a more noticeable "bump" to the left of 0 than in CM2.6 - do we know what that "bump" is?NOTE: CESM results are only across 2 years, whereas CM2.6 results are across 20.