Closed uturuncoglu closed 1 month ago
@pvelissariou1 Maybe as a part of your work and PR in ufs-coastal level, we could also update those names. It would be easier to understand which executable for which configuration rather than tracking those numbers in the executables.
@uturuncoglu Ok, I will eliminate the numbering sequence. Also we might want ro change fv3 to say UFS.x or something like that.
@uturuncoglu Let's talk about these today after the UFS-CAT meeting
@pvelissariou1 Sure. But changing fv3 could create downstream issues since it is prefix and also I don' want to modify rt.sh extensively. If we would like to make that changes, that needs to be in the UFS Weather Model level.
Description
As a part of following convention in the UFS Weather Model side, we might want to update
rt_coastal.conf
and get rid of number used in the name of the executable. For example, the following definitionwould be
Also, it is hard to keep track those numbers.
Solution
Update
rt_coastal.conf
Alternatives
N/A
Related to
N/A