Here's the policy for sensitive data. There are arguments both ways, as to whether this is sensitive data according to the policy.
As all of this is new, the actor did not knowingly publish something that may be construed as sensitive. Their other 15 datasets have had no questions.
Therefore the first rational action is to restore the actor from purgatory. That's the aim of this issue. The asset itself will be dealt with afterwards.
trentmc
commented
3 years ago
The actor with Eth address 0x01e66950353400E93AEe7F041C0303103E2ef5Ab is in the purgatory list.
When purgatory went live today, they tweeted that they were surprised to be in purgatory.
They've published 16 datasets:
Here's the policy for sensitive data. There are arguments both ways, as to whether this is sensitive data according to the policy.
As all of this is new, the actor did not knowingly publish something that may be construed as sensitive. Their other 15 datasets have had no questions.
Therefore the first rational action is to restore the actor from purgatory. That's the aim of this issue. The asset itself will be dealt with afterwards.