Restore asset 0x05882 from purgatory, if appropriate

[trentmc]

This is related to #15.

The asset 0x05882.. had been moved to purgatory, and with it, the actor 0x01e669 who published it.

15 resulted in the actor being restored from purgatory.

This issue is about whether to restore the asset from purgatory.

Here's the policy for sensitive data.

Goals of this issue:

• [x] Identify whether to restore the asset. The most straightforward way is to contact the original flagger of the asset.
• [x] If "yes" to restore it, then restore it from purgatory, by removing it from the purgatory list

[trentmc]

DataWhale had initially flagged the asset. We contacted them. We pointed them to the policy and asked where the asset fit. DataWhale responded "reading through the policy, the dataset does not pose any security risks and it was indeed a broad interpretation. Therefore, we believe it could be taken out of purgatory"

That is: DataWhale rescinded the report of this asset being sensitive data.

Therefore, we can remove this asset from purgatory.

[trentmc]

Done