Closed OlivierNicole closed 2 months ago
Can you try to keep the bytecode mode as well ? It is useful to check js vs non-js behavior
Sorry about that. Done
Oops, unassigned myself by mistake.
Can you try to keep the bytecode mode as well ? It is useful to check js vs non-js behavior
We were only building the code, not running it, though...
Can you try to keep the bytecode mode as well ? It is useful to check js vs non-js behavior
We were only building the code, not running it, though...
I'm pretty sure I've run the byte version at the time to check the behavior. I don't remember why I didn't implement a js-vs-bytecode test though
It's
Can you try to keep the bytecode mode as well ? It is useful to check js vs non-js behavior
We were only building the code, not running it, though...
I'm pretty sure I've run the byte version at the time to check the behavior. I don't remember why I didn't implement a js-vs-bytecode test though
It's possible that I only ran the byte version without argument, (not calling unregister)
This is part of a series of PRs intending to reduce the diff between js_of_ocaml and wasm_of_ocaml (see ocaml-wasm/wasm_of_ocaml#47).