Binary clock represents decimal digits instead of actual time

[rhodium88]

Currently the binary clock shows the binary equivalent of each digit in the decimal representation of the time. For instance, 12 is represented as 01 0010; first the 1 is converted, and then the 2, with the results shown side-by-side. This is akin to representing 0xFF as "15 15" in decimal.

A more accurate method would be to convert the number rather than its constituent digits, so that 12 would be represented as 01100 on a 24 hour clock.

Perhaps a configuration option could allow users to choose between binary conversion of the digits in the decimal representation of the time, and binary conversion of the numbers in the time?

[octobanana]

The method used currently, where each binary column represents the value of a single clock digit, is an intentional design choice. The clock correctly and accurately displays the time as intended.

Representing the time using 3 binary values instead of 6 is a different design, it would not make the clock more accurate.

[octobanana]

The current binary clock implementation displays the clock in binary-coded decimal encoding. An option to display the binary clock where each unit of time, hour, minute, and seconds encoded as binary could be added as a configuration option.

There would be either 2 or 3 binary values shown, depending on if the seconds view is toggled on or off. The hour would need either 4 or 5 blocks to display the range 0 - 1100 in 12 hour mode or 00000 - 10111 in 24 hour mode. The minutes and seconds would need 6 blocks to display the range 000000 - 111011. I think a vertical layout would work best for utilizing the space. What do you think?

    |  | | | | < H
|  |  | | | | < M
|  |  | | | | < S
32 16 8 4 2 1