Closed ali-tny closed 4 years ago
That's great @ali-tny , thanks for checking pandas changes!
weird.. tests ran locally (w/ the version changes - i assumed the failure was from that) i'll check it out yeah
ah, looks like some intermittent pytest problem, reran the workflow and it fails at the version test as expected
Merging #11 into master will increase coverage by
<.01%
. The diff coverage is100%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #11 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.86% 88.86% +<.01%
==========================================
Files 34 34
Lines 1643 1644 +1
==========================================
+ Hits 1460 1461 +1
Misses 183 183
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
timeserio/preprocessing/pandas.py | 89.15% <100%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
timeserio/data/mock.py | 95.91% <100%> (+0.08%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b64d59c...559b0ea. Read the comment docs.
I went through the changes for anything relevant to timeserio. The main problem (in timeserio/preprocessing/pandas.py) was caught by a test (wahoo)
Tests will fail due to the version test, which is fixed in https://github.com/octoenergy/timeserio/pull/10. Will rebase this once that PR is merged.