Closed oscard0m closed 4 months ago
👋 Hi! Thank you for this contribution! Just to let you know, our GitHub SDK team does a round of issue and PR reviews twice a week, every Monday and Friday! We have a process in place for prioritizing and responding to your input. Because you are a part of this community please feel free to comment, add to, or pick up any issues/PRs that are labled with Status: Up for grabs
. You & others like you are the reason all of this works! So thank you & happy coding! 🚀
Would it be a good idea to bump universal-github-app-jwt
to 2.2
Would it be a good idea to bump
universal-github-app-jwt
to 2.2
yes, please! Bump it to ^2.2.0
to make sure that it supports the string ID: https://github.com/gr2m/universal-github-app-jwt/releases/tag/v2.2.0
Would it be a good idea to bump universal-github-app-jwt to 2.2
yes, please! Bump it to ^2.2.0 to make sure that it supports the string ID: https://github.com/gr2m/universal-github-app-jwt/releases/tag/v2.2.0
Isn't v2.2.0
of universal-github-app-jwt
already in place?
https://github.com/octokit/auth-app.js/blob/81ac6ecd51985906888c31b4f43c83402ffc03ef/package-lock.json#L6201-L6202 introduced by Renovate in https://github.com/octokit/auth-app.js/pull/604
Would it be a good idea to bump universal-github-app-jwt to 2.2
yes, please! Bump it to ^2.2.0 to make sure that it supports the string ID: https://github.com/gr2m/universal-github-app-jwt/releases/tag/v2.2.0
Isn't
v2.2.0
ofuniversal-github-app-jwt
already in place?https://github.com/octokit/auth-app.js/blob/81ac6ecd51985906888c31b4f43c83402ffc03ef/package-lock.json#L6201-L6202 introduced by Renovate in #604
That is only the package-lock.json
which isn't published. Consumers rely on the dependencies listed in package.json
@oscard0m if it's done from your side, can you let me merge it please? I want to test out the latest semantic-release
beta version in a real-life environment
@oscard0m if it's done from your side, can you let me merge it please? I want to test out the latest
semantic-release
beta version in a real-life environment
go for it @gr2m
:tada: This PR is included in version 7.1.0 :tada:
The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot :package::rocket:
@oscard0m should I create an issue to update the README?
By my reading, the appId is required and clientId is optional, which confused me.
I didn't see any mention that clientId could be assigned to appId.
@oscard0m should I create an issue to update the README?
that would be great, thank you!
appId
allows string or number as typeResolves #603
Before the change?
appId
only allowednumber
as type.After the change?
appId
allowsnumber
orstring
as type.Pull request checklist
Does this introduce a breaking change?
Please see our docs on breaking changes to help!