Incoming stupid question: How to embed liquid codes in blog

[super119]

Hi Parkr, just a stupid question: I wrote a blog which want to embed some liquid codes(with triple backtick) in it, but I got an error when doing rake generate.

So it seems that liquid engine treats the code I embedded as liquid codes. How to handle that? Finally I save the codes into a file and use {% include_code xxx %} to get through.

BTW: Don't know whether it's OK to ask questions here, let me know if I'm wrong.

[parkr]

What error did you get? Do you want to see the actual liquid tags in your final output, or to render them?

[super119]

You can check the blog here:

http://markzhang.cn/blog/2013/11/05/add-uyan-comment/

Sorry it doesn't have an English version, but you just need to care about the code I pasted in the blog.

The problem is, if I paste this code inside the blog, the build error occurs(check below). Now I paste the code by using {% include_code %}, just as I mentioned previously.

## Generating Site with Jekyll
unchanged sass/screen.scss
Configuration from /work/markz/Projects/blog/_config.yml
Building site: source -> public
Liquid Exception: if tag was never closed in 2013-11-05-add-uyan-comment.markdown
/home/markz/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/liquid-2.3.0/lib/liquid/block.rb:88:in `assert_missing_delimitation!'
/home/markz/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/liquid-2.3.0/lib/liquid/block.rb:49:in `parse'
/home/markz/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/liquid-2.3.0/lib/liquid/tag.rb:10:in `initialize'
/home/markz/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/liquid-2.3.0/lib/liquid/tags/if.rb:24:in `initialize'
/home/markz/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/liquid-2.3.0/lib/liquid/block.rb:28:in `new'
/home/markz/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/liquid-2.3.0/lib/liquid/block.rb:28:in `parse'
/home/markz/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/liquid-2.3.0/lib/liquid/document.rb:5:in `initialize'
/home/markz/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/liquid-2.3.0/lib/liquid/template.rb:58:in `new'
/home/markz/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/liquid-2.3.0/lib/liquid/template.rb:58:in `parse'
/home/markz/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/liquid-2.3.0/lib/liquid/template.rb:46:in `parse'
/home/markz/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/jekyll-0.12.0/lib/jekyll/convertible.rb:79:in `do_layout'
/work/markz/Projects/blog/plugins/post_filters.rb:167:in `do_layout'
/home/markz/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/jekyll-0.12.0/lib/jekyll/post.rb:195:in `render'
/home/markz/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/jekyll-0.12.0/lib/jekyll/site.rb:200:in `block in render'
/home/markz/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/jekyll-0.12.0/lib/jekyll/site.rb:199:in `each'
/home/markz/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/jekyll-0.12.0/lib/jekyll/site.rb:199:in `render'
/home/markz/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/jekyll-0.12.0/lib/jekyll/site.rb:41:in `process'
/home/markz/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p0/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/jekyll-0.12.0/bin/jekyll:264:in `<top (required)>'
/home/markz/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p0/bin/jekyll:23:in `load'
/home/markz/.rbenv/versions/1.9.3-p0/bin/jekyll:23:in `<main>'
Build Failed

[parkr]

Ah! I see the problem.

Your code contains a Liquid if tag. What you need to do in order to print liquid (i.e. not render it), is put it in a raw block:

{% highlight diff %}
{% raw %}
...
{% endraw %}
{% endhighlight %}

(The highlight tag assumes that you wish to highlight your code and is only one way of doing so)

[super119]

Oh~ It works, despite the hightlight of diff seems not working. Big thanks parkr.

[super119]

Hi Parkr, I did another test:

{% raw %}
blablabla...
{% endraw %}

This also works, except there are 2 blank lines at the beginning and the bottom of the output(guess it's created by raw & endraw?). And this has syntax highlighting.

[parkr]

You can also move the raw tags to outside the triple backticks. That should remove the blank lines at the start and end.

[super119]

Yeah, it works. Thanks.